MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2525362500 · doi:10.1109/mmar.2016.7575308

Performance enhancement for GPS/INS fusion by using a fuzzy adaptive unscented Kalman filter

2016· article· en· W2525362500 on OpenAlexaff
Setareh Yazdkhasti, Jurek Z. Sąsiadek, Steve Ulrich

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Extended Kalman filterKalman filterFast Kalman filterAlpha beta filterInvariant extended Kalman filterComputer scienceFuzzy logicUnscented transformSensor fusionAdaptive filterKernel adaptive filterEnsemble Kalman filterFilter (signal processing)AlgorithmFilter designArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kalman filter requires that the process noises to be zero mean white noise; otherwise, the divergence will occur. Adaptive tuning of a Kalman filter via fuzzy logic has been one of the promising strategies to cope with divergence when dealing with non-white noise. The fuzzy logic adaptive controller (FLAC) will continually adjust the noise strengths in the filter's internal model and tune the filter. This paper presents a new INS/GPS sensor fusion scheme based on Fuzzy Adaptive Unscented Kalman Filter (FAUKF). The FAUKF is based on the combination of the unscented Kalman filter and the fuzzy logic controller which performs adaptation task for dynamic characteristics. Results obtained by FAUKF were compared to the Extended Kalman filter (EKF), Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) and Fuzzy Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter (FAEKF). This comparative study has demonstrated that the FAUKF leads to very promising results as compared the other three Kalman filters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207