L’innovation managériale : rupture ou évolution du management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’entreprise libérée, La faillite managériale, Lost in management , toutes ces expressions sont des titres de livres mais ne constituent-elles pas des signaux faibles de l’émergence d’une autre forme de management. Héritée du taylorisme le management a construit des pratiques sur le modèle hiérarchique commande/contrôle en associant des boucles participatives. Ce modèle vit-il, sous l’impulsion sociétale et technologique, ses dernières heures ou est-il en train de muter pour servir un système social lui-même en mutation ? L’objectif de cet article est de définir par les pratiques en entreprise ce que nous entendons par « innovation managériale » afin de s’interroger sur les nouvelles formes de management et leur ossature pour proposer non par un nouveau modèle de management mais une manière d’inventer des formes de management dans une logique de coconstruction avec les principaux intéressés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".