MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2525507994 · doi:10.20360/g21w2h

Litteraties et creacollage numerique

2016· article· fr· W2525507994 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Martine Peters, Sylvie Gervais

Bibliographic record

VenueLanguage and Literacy · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
FundersDepartment for Children, Schools and FamiliesUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le présent article s’intéresse aux littératies numérique et informationnelle ainsi qu’aux liens qu’elles entretiennent avec le créacollage numérique. Le modèle de créacollage numérique présenté fait le rapprochement entre les compétences informationnelles, rédactionnelles et de référencement documentaire, expliquant comment les stratégies de créacollage numérique se retrouvent à toutes les étapes de la création d’un texte. L’article se termine par un plaidoyer pour la formation des élèves de tous les niveaux scolaires afin que ceux-ci puissent développer leurs habiletés liées aux littératies numérique et informationnelle ainsi que leurs stratégies de créacollage numérique pour apprendre à bien rédiger leurs travaux scolaires avec intégrité intellectuelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLanguage and LiteracySame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207