MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2525546114 · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b04218

Phosphatidylserine Allows Observation of the Calcium–Myristoyl Switch of Recoverin and Its Preferential Binding

2016· article· en· W2525546114 on OpenAlexafffund
Philippe Calvez, Thaís F. Schmidt, Line Cantin, Kristina Klinker, Christian Salesse

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalHôpital du Saint-Sacrement
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsRecoverinPhosphatidylserineMyristoylationChemistryBiophysicsCalciumBiochemistryPhospholipidMembraneRhodopsinBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recoverin undergoes a calcium-myristoyl switch during visual phototransduction. Indeed, calcium binding by recoverin results in the extrusion of its myristoyl group, which allows its membrane binding. However, the contribution of particular lipids and of specific amino acids of recoverin in its membrane binding has not yet been demonstrated. In the present work, the affinity of recoverin for the negatively charged phosphatidylserine has been clearly shown to be governed by a cluster of positively charged residues located in its N-terminal segment. Moreover, the calcium-myristoyl switch of recoverin was only observed upon binding onto monolayers of phosphatidylserine and not in the case of other anionic phospholipids. Fluorescence microscopy experiments with mixed lipid monolayers allowed confirmation of the specific binding of myristoylated recoverin to phosphatidylserine, whereas the extent of penetration of recoverin in phosphatidylserine monolayers was estimated by ellipsometry. A model has thus been proposed for the membrane binding of myristoylated recoverin in the presence of calcium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicLipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207