MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2525549156 · doi:10.3968/8659

The Research and Application of New Horizontal Well for Offshore Oilfield Thin Reservoir Based on Pseudo Steady State Time

2016· article· en· W2525549156 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhanhua Zhang, Xue Liu, Jian‐Min Zhang, Chunxin Wu, Cong Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrawdown (hydrology)Submarine pipelineProductivityPetroleum engineeringHorizontal and verticalGeologyEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringGeodesyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluids rate forecast of horizontal well are particularly important as horizontal well technology is widely used in bohai oilfield. According to the sector planning, horizontal well productivity is two to five times as much as directional well, combined with drawdown pressure, reservoir thickness and permeability to determine the horizontal well productivity. But this method lack of theoretical basis and need reservoir personnel has rich experience at the same time the compute number is the fixed value that can’t reflect time dependent process of horizontal well productivity. In this paper a new mathematical model is constructed and introduced investigation radius. Based on these a new equation is derived. This theory can provide valuable for horizontal well productivity during a period of time, at the same time it can judgment whether the reservoir existing skin through production performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207