MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2525561613 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.116.014702

Letter by Mattingly et al Regarding Article, “Endovascular Hypothermia in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Pilot Study of Selective Intra-Arterial Cold Saline Infusion”

2016· letter· en· W2525561613 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Mattingly, Stephen P. Lownie, David M. Pelz

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2016
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHypothermiaStroke (engine)SalineAcute strokeAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with interest the article by Chen et al 1 and had many questions about the methodology and findings.This report indicates that a drop in cerebral tissue temperature was observed.However, the Methods section 1 does not describe brain tissue monitoring or external surrogates such as nasopharyngeal temperature.Under the Discussion section, the authors state "we used data from a previous study to estimate the temperature reduction" and, in addition, "…we anticipate that we could have achieved at least a 2°C temperature drop in the ischemic territory."This contradicts the statement presented in the Abstract and Results sections, which states that "The temperature of ischemic cerebral tissue was decreased by at least 2°C during infusion of the cold solution…"; therefore, we are uncertain whether the authors actually measured a drop in brain tissue temperature.In addition, the results indicate that rectal temperature was decreased to 0.1°C.We have assumed the authors' intent is the degree of rectal temperature reduction, not the absolute number; however, this is unclear.We also note that the Abstract 1 states different systemic temperature reduction (maximum 0.3°C) and tables do not show final or postinfusion temperature.We note that this is a safety trial.No evidence of efficacy is presented.However, the high incidence of vasospasm (15.4%) and pneumonia (38.5%) raise questions as to the safety of this technique, which is the primary end point.A prior trial using ice cold saline in diagnostic angiography did not detect angiographic vasospasm. 2The ICTuS-L study (Intravascular Cooling in the Treatment of Stroke-Longer window) detected a significant increase in pneumonia in the hypothermia arm. 3Therefore, we think that both of these measures are relevant to assessing safety and feasibility of endovascular ice cold saline in acute stroke.The lack of a reported baseline nonintervention cohort makes assessment of these critical measures impossible.Unfortunately, this report raises more questions than it answers about the effect and safety of ice cold saline during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke and utility remains completely unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0320.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances→French-language works237,207→