Élites et leaders ethniques : entre mobilité sociale et structuration communautaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pour rendre compte de la situation post-migratoire en Europe continentale, l’auteur, ayant distingué entre catégorie ethnique et communauté ethnique et entre élites ethniques et leader ethnique, trace le bilan et les enjeux théoriques de l’étude des élites et du leadership ethniques dans la même région du monde. Une critique de la version la plus courante de la thèse de l’ethnicisation des rapports sociaux est présentée et une théorisation à la fois alternative et complémentaire est exposée. Cette théorisation met en évidence les relations de pouvoir et d’impuissance qui se nouent entre la polity de la société d’immigration et les communautés ethniques d’origine immigrée. La position et le rôle des élites et des leaders ethniques dans ces relations inégalitaires font l’objet d’une attention particulière. Dans la troisième partie de l’article, l’exemple de la collectivité belge francophone d’origine italienne sert à illustrer les propositions théoriques avancées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".