MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2525833183 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2015.2476963

Energy Storage System Control for Prevention of Transient Under-Frequency Load Shedding

2015· article· en· W2525833183 on OpenAlexaff
Shuthakini Pulendran, Joseph Euzebe Tate

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Control theory (sociology)Electric power systemEngineeringVoltage droopController (irrigation)Load SheddingReliability (semiconductor)InertiaAutomatic frequency controlEnergy storageNonlinear systemKalman filterControl engineeringComputer scienceReliability engineeringPower (physics)Control (management)Voltage regulatorVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes and evaluates a systematic method for controlling an energy storage system for preventing load shedding due to transient declines in frequency. The proposed controller works on local measurements and uses an extended Kalman filter to perform online identification of system parameters. These results are then used to implement a model predictive controller for the safe withdrawal of support and energy recovery, both without incurring transient load shedding. The formulation accounts for single generator outages and includes power system parameters such as inertia, damping, and droop. The proposed method is evaluated using the nonlinear simulations of 6-bus and 24-bus test systems known as Roy Billinton Test System (RBTS) and IEEE Reliability Test System. The results show that the proposed controller is effective in preventing transient load shedding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207