Early clinical and functional results of short modular femoral metaphyseal stem hip arthroplasty: a pilot study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term results, complications, and functional outcomes associated with short femoral metaphyseal hip arthroplasty. Methods: Twenty-nine hips with coxarthrosis were included in the study. Each patient had outpatient clinical examination and follow-up (mean 20 mo) with evaluation using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) score, Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the hip. Results: Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the preoperative and the postoperative outcome scores. The radiographic evaluation revealed no differences. No one had cup or femoral implant loosening and no heterotopic ossification. Conclusions: This study showed that a short femoral metaphyseal stem can obtain early satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes without compromising implant stability. Future investigations should evaluate whether such results may be maintained after a longer time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it