Segment-Based Terrain Filtering Technique for Elevation-Based Building Detection in VHR Remote Sensing Images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building detection in very high resolution (VHR) remote sensing images is crucial for many urban planning and management applications. Since buildings are elevated objects, the incorporation of elevation data provides a mean to reliable detection. However, almost all existing methods of elevation-based building detection must first generate a normalized Digital Surface Model (nDSM). This model is generated by processes of extracting and subtracting terrain elevations from the DSM data. The generation of accurate nDSM is still a challenging task to some extent. This paper introduces a segment-based terrain filtering (SegTF) technique to filter out the terrain elevations directly using DSM elevations. This technique has four steps: elevation co-registration, image segmentation, slope calculation, and building detection. These steps of the developed technique were applied to a dataset that consisted of a VHR image and a corresponding DSM for detecting buildings. The result of the building detection was evaluated and found to be 100% correct with an overall detection quality of 93%. These values indicate a highly reliable and promising technique for mapping buildings in VHR images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it