MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526262749 · doi:10.18566/escr.v24n52.a07

MUNDO CERRADO, MUNDO ABIERTO LAS ESTRUCTURAS DEL PENSAMIENTO MODERNO SEGÚN CHARLES TAYLOR

2016· article· en· W2526262749 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alejandra Fierro Valbuena

Bibliographic record

VenueEscritos · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscendence (philosophy)SecularityModernityImmanenceThe ImaginaryReification (Marxism)PhilosophyLate modernityEpistemologySociologyHumanitiesReligious studiesSocial sciencePsychoanalysisPolitical scienceLawPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modernity as a period of human history, but above all as social imaginary, has been one of the topics most widely studied by Canadian author Charles Taylor. The article explores the concept of "closed world structures" through which the author argues that modernity is located within a framework closed to transcendence, and that such a framework has been built on the philosophical thought as a result of some epistemological, ethical and anthropological positions. The contrast between that what is closed and open, the immanence and transcendence, are the key elements of understanding proposed by Taylor to form the map of modern and contemporary thought; and, thus, explains dynamics -such as secularity- and the cultural consequences of scientific and technological development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEscritosSame topicMulticultural Socio-Legal StudiesFrench-language works237,207