The performance of a PEO-cofactor-bentonite retention and drainage aid system on a laboratory twin-wire sheet former
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Un formeur de laboratoire a double toile recemment mis au point a permis d'etudier la chimie et la technique de la fabrication du papier dans des conditions tres similaires a celles de l'industrie. Dans la presente etude, nous presentons un rapport sur la retention des fines et l'egouttage sur ce type de machine, a l'aide d'un systeme d'agents de retention a trois elements, le poly(ethylene oxyde) (PEOX), un cofacteur, et de la bentonite. Il est montre que les essais de retention et d'egouttage sur le formeur a double toile de laboratoire sont reproductibles. Lorsqu'on utilisait des systemes a PEOX-cofacteur, la retention des fines etait accompagnee d'une reduction de l'egouttage, tandis qu'en presence de bentonite a un dosage optimal, nous avons observe une retention similaire, mais sans perte d'egouttage. Ces resultats reproduisent le comportement observe sur les machines a papier industrielles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".