MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526439415 · doi:10.5539/apr.v8n5p1

Limiting Velocities of Primary, Obscure and Normal Particles: Self-Annihilating Obscure Particle as an Example of Dark Matter Particle

2016· article· en· W2526439415 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDark matterLimitingParticle (ecology)Elementary particleMuonParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From recently established bicubic equation, three particle limiting velocities are derived, primary, c1,obscure, c2 and normal, c3,that in principle may belong to a single particle. The values of limiting velocities are governed by the congruent particle parameter, z = 3\sqrt3mv2=2E, with m; v and E being, respectively, particle mass, velocity and energy, generally satisfying 1 <= z <= 1, and here just 0 <= z <= 1.<br />While c3 is practically the same in value as v, c1 and c2 can depart from v as z changes from 1 to 0, since c1, c2 and c3; are, in forms, explicitly different from each other, which offers the chance to look at possible new forms of matter, such as dark matter. For instance, one finds that c3 could be slightly different from c, the velocity of light, for the 2010 Crab Nebula Flare PeV electron energy region and for the OPERA 17 GeV muon neutrino velocity experiments, while at the same time, although not measurable in these experiments, calculated c1 and jc2j, are numerically about 105 times larger than c3.<br />There is a belief that an exemplary particle of small velocity, v = 10-3c ,and small energy, E = 1eV , but as yet of not known mass, should belong to the dark matter class. Once knowing z the value of the mass is fixed with 3\sqrt3m(z)v2 = 2Ez ,and its maximum value m(1) is at z = 1, m(1) = 2E=(v23\sqrt3):This mass value defines the test particle, with which one calulates primary, obscure and normal particle rest energies at z = 1: Snce at z = 1 theory predicts c21(1) = (3=2) v2;c22<br />(1) = 3v2; c23 (1) = (3=2) v2, the rest energies are m(1) c21(1) = m(1) c23(1) = 0:58eV and m(1)(c22(1))= 1:15eV. The primary and normal particles, with positive kinetic energies self-creation process increase their energies from 0:58eV to desired1eV: The obscure particle, with negative kinetic energy self-annihilation process decreases its energy of 1:15eV to desired 1eV. This makes the obscure (imaginary c2) particle as a good candidate for a dark matter particle,since as it is believed that a trapped dark matter particle with self-annihilation properties helps keeping the equilibrium between capture and annihilation rates in the sun.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it