Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article vise à exposer la situation du régime de la copie privée face à Internet, tant dans son application que dans sa légitimité. L’auteur soumet notamment que l’exception de la copie privée n’est applicable ni à la mise à disposition ni au téléchargement de fichiers musicaux sur Internet à moins que, quant à ce dernier acte, la copie provienne d’une source licite, ce qui exclut les réseaux peer-to-peer. Ensuite, l’auteur analyse la question quant à savoir si les enregistreurs audionumériques et les disques durs des ordinateurs personnels devraient être soumis aux redevances au Canada, et conclut à l’effet qu’une réforme de la Loi sur le droit d’auteur est de mise si l’on veut en arriver à une telle éventualité. Finalement dans la dernière partie, l’auteur soulève la question de la remise en cause du régime de la copie privée face à l’importance grandissante que l‘on accorde à la gestion numérique des droits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".