MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526548611 · doi:10.1063/1.4964120

High-photovoltage GaAs vertical epitaxial monolithic heterostructures with 20 thin p/n junctions and a conversion efficiency of 60%

2016· article· en· W2526548611 on OpenAlexaff
S. Fafard, F. Proulx, M. C. A. York, Philippe‐Olivier Provost, Richard Arès, Vincent Aimez, Denis Masson

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterojunctionQuantum efficiencyOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceEnergy conversion efficiencyEpitaxyThin filmWavelengthQuantum wellPhotovoltaic systemOpticsPhysicsNanotechnologyElectrical engineeringLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photovoltaic power converting III–V semiconductor devices based on the Vertical Epitaxial HeteroStructure Architecture (VEHSA) design have been achieved with up to 20 thin p/n junctions (PT20). Open circuit photovoltages in excess of 23 V are measured for a continuous wave monochromatic optical input power of ∼1 W tuned in the 750 nm–875 nm wavelength range. Conversion efficiencies greater than 60% are demonstrated when the PT20 devices are measured near the peak of their spectral response. Noticeably, the PT20 structure is implemented with its narrowest ultrathin base having a thickness of only 24 nm. In the present study, the spectral response of the PT20 peaks at external quantum efficiency (EQE) of 89%/20 for an input wavelength of 841 nm. We also performed a detailed analysis of the EQE dependence with temperature and for VEHSA structures realised with a varied number of p/n junctions. The systematic study reveals the correlations between the measured conversion efficiencies, the EQE behavior, and the small deviations in the implementation of the optimal designs. Furthermore, we modeled the photovoltage performance of devices designed with thinner bases. For example, we derive that the narrowest subcell of a PT60 structure would have a base as thin as 8 nm, it is expected to still generate an individual subcell photovoltage of 1.14 V, and it will begin to feature 2-dimensional quantum well effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations105
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicsolar cell performance optimizationFrench-language works237,207