MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526617145 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2016.2608771

Loewner Matrix Macromodeling for Y-Parameter Data With a Priori $\textbf {D}$ Matrix Extraction

2016· article· en· W2526617145 on OpenAlex
Muhammad Kabir, Roni Khazaka

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)Impedance parametersPassivityAdmittance parametersMatrix (chemical analysis)A priori and a posterioriAlgorithmElectrical impedanceComputer scienceMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Macromodeling techniques using Loewner matrix (LM) interpolation were proposed recently as a way to generate time-domain macromodels based on simulated V-parameters. These approaches scale very well with respect to the number of ports as well as the number of poles in the system. However, these methods become less efficient in terms of accuracy and passivity for V-parameters obtained using electromagnetic simulators. In this paper, we propose an LM-based interpolation technique that is applicable for large-scale distributed systems described by full-wave V-parameters. An algorithm to approximate and extract the port impedance matrix D directly from the data is proposed. Additionally, an order selection scheme is proposed that results in an accurate macromodel while maintaining passivity. The efficiency and accuracy of the proposed approach is illustrated using comparisons with a standard technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it