MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526884022 · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.09.007

Corrigendum to “A scoping review of geographic information systems in maternal health” [Int J Gynecol Obstet 134(2016) 13–17]

2016· erratum· en· W2526884022 on OpenAlexaffabout
Prestige Tatenda Makanga, Nadine Schuurman, Peter von Dadelszen, Tabassum Firoz

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 2016
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser University
FundersBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsPrestigeLibrary scienceGeographyMedicineGeographerCartographyDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors regret that the Acknowledgments section should have been as follows: “The present study was funded by the Grand Challenges Canada Stars in Global Health program, a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation grant as part of the Pre-eclampsia Eclampsia Monitoring Prevention and Treatment (PreEMPT) initiative, and the Canadian Institute of Health Research grant KPE-124730.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecology & ObstetricsSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207