MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526908320

Ronald Niezen, Truth and Indignation: Canada’s truth and Reconciliation Commission on Residential Schools, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2013

2015· article· en· W2526908320 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sarah Bédard

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de droit international · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCambodian History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndignationCommissionPolitical scienceHumanitiesEconomic JusticeLawPhilosophyPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Convention de reglement relative aux pensionnats indiens (CRRPI) adoptee en 2007 represente sans contredit le plus important recours collectif ayant eu lieu au Canada. Elle a donne lieu a la Commission de Verite et de Reconciliation canadienne (CVRC). Les Commissions de Verite et de Reconciliation visent habituellement a reconcilier et a permettre un processus de guerison nationale apres des episodes de violence a grande echelle dans un Etat donne. Elles font partie des mecanismes de « justice transitionnelle » que le Secretaire general des Nations Unies definit comme:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.009
Science and technology studies0.0170.020
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0090.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de droit internationalSame topicCambodian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207