MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526909081 · doi:10.1111/jpc.13331

The hospital world according to Aaron

2016· article· en· W2526909081 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sue Robins

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWonderMedicineSedationSurgeryPsychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

My youngest son Aaron (who is 12 and happens to have Down syndrome) had day surgery recently at our children's hospital. In an effort not to be a ‘secret shopper’, I try to take my family centred care hat off when I'm in the hospital with my boy. I focus on him as opposed to critiquing every single interaction. Yes, the experience wasn't perfect – the clerk calling me to confirm Aaron's surgery time didn't mention that the entrance to the day ward had been moved in the midst of renovations (so I got lost); kids waiting for surgery were jammed into a makeshift waiting room; I was called ‘mom’ an awful lot; and one of the nurses said to me, ‘It is so good he's so high functioning’. Overall, the clinical care was exceptional, everybody was respectful towards Aaron, and we were able to go home 5 h after we arrived. That seems like success to me. My youngest son has had four surgeries in his life, and this was the first time I did not push the pre-sedation request. Aaron was relaxed and joking with the nurses, so I thought – let's just see what happens if he doesn't get sedation before he goes into the operating room (OR). I warned him there would be lots of people and bright lights in the OR, and he was perfectly fine (I now wonder if the pre-sedation request was more for me: mom needs sedation). It is fortunate that our hospital has parental presence at induction, which means I was able to go into the OR with him until he was asleep. I teared up a bit when he was put under, as I always do – and the kind anaesthetist said to me: ‘We will take good care of him’. And that they did. Afterwards, I reflected on Aaron's own experience as a patient. He was annoyed that he had to wear a dress (Fig. 1). Apparently, the hospital switched to gowns for kids and don't use pyjamas any more. He had to wear a mask because he had a cough. Sensory-wise, that was not great – it was scratchy and bothered him and he kept taking it off. Despite the fact we explained the going to sleep thing, the first thing he shouted when he woke up after surgery was: ‘I AM NOT DEAD!’ I'm horrified he thought he might have died – I am constantly in awe of how this kid's mind works. I harkened back to earlier in the year when we had to put our beloved chocolate lab ‘to sleep’ and realised I needed to adjust my own explanations and avoid euphemisms. In Aaron's mind, the dog died after he was put to sleep, so why shouldn't he? Oy. Point well taken. The day surgery unit was busy and unfortunately, some of the kids didn't wake up well after surgery, and there was a fair bit of crying and screaming. There was also a considerable amount of construction noise – hammering and drilling. ‘I don't like hospitals’, Aaron told me. I asked why. ‘I don't like these screaming kids. It is too noisy here’, he said. I realised that a less open physical space would have worked better for him, a boy with auditory sensory issues. He wouldn't even consider the popsicle the nurses offered him after surgery. He said, ‘The food here is disgusting’, drawing upon his (accurate) memory as a hospital inpatient. ‘I want to go home’, he concluded. Ask him about his own patient experience, and this is what you get – he is a fountain of truth. I'm grateful for his uneventful experience. I'm also thankful for the folks at the hospital who cared for him: the clerk at reception, the practical nurses, the recovery room nurses, the porters, the surgeon, the OR nurses and the anaesthetist. They all had smiles on their faces, spoke to Aaron directly and did their jobs quickly and competently. This story is a gentle reminder that all surgery is a big deal to families and kids, even if it is considered ‘minor’ to the professionals. I feel fortunate that Aaron's experience included such caring health professionals, and that he is now home safe and sound. What is most interesting about this brief time in the hospital is Aaron's perception of it. For a child with Down syndrome and an identified intellectual disability, he communicated well about his own patient experience. It reminded me that none of us should speak up on his behalf, for he is quite capable of speaking up for himself. Sue Robins is a mother of three and a writer and speaker in the world of patient and family centred care. In her paid work life, she is the Family Advisor at the Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children in Vancouver, Canada. She also co-owns a health communication company called Bird Communications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0080.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.046

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Paediatrics and Child HealthSame topicEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcareFrench-language works237,207