MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2526989383

Faith as a Therapeutic Companion: Instructing Counselling Students on the Import of Religion/La Foi Comme Compagne De la Thérapie : Instruire Les éTudiants En Counseling De L'importance De la Religion

2016· article· fr· W2526989383 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Trent Leighton

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFaithSpiritualityPsychologyCurriculumValue (mathematics)FeelingContext (archaeology)HumanismSocial psychologyPsychotherapistPsychoanalysisSociologyPedagogyEpistemologyTheologyPhilosophyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The muzzling of faith in most counselling curricula is a direct by-product of the acrimonious relationship between psychology and religion. religion and spirituality elicit deep feelings in people and because they speak to people's deepest values, practicing psychologists must be careful to approach these processes with knowledge, sensitivity, and care (Pargament, 2013, para. 8). This environment, void of neutrality and defined by strong and passionate opinions, presents unique and challenging dynamics for students who are in the midst of reconciling their personal and professional realities.Care and sensitivity extended to religious clients has been the exception rather than the rule, and their absence was germinated not in the offices of practicing therapists but in the classroom, where instructors frequently present religious beliefs as a therapeutic afterthought. Although psychoanalytic theory does not garner much airtime in counselling programs, the root cause of this dismissive stance toward the impact of religious beliefs in training programs can be traced to a fundamental misinterpretation around a simple question posed by Freud (1927/1961): Wherein lies the peculiar value of religious ideals? (p. 21). I take the stance that Freud was not precluding the value of religion in psychotherapeutic training and practice, but rather was critical of passive, reactive, and regressive theological systems. For educators, this critical engagement is an integral part of any effective pedagogy.Thus, in a fresh context, Freud's (1927/1961) premature closure of the religious question can become a point of debate and self-reflection for students to evaluate their respective views about religion as a therapeutic companion. My experience is that even the most adamant atheists in a counselling cohort are willing to expand the embedded reality of faith in cultural and existential landscapes to the assessments and interventions of counselling. This reality was emphasized by Fromm (1955), who noted that every human being is innately religious in the wider sense of not being able to extract oneself from systems of meaning while also remaining sane.RELIGION AS ACTIVITY VERSUS OBJECTUnderlying the fallacies I address in this article is the core principle of religion as an activity. The majority of counselling programs continue to introduce students to a paradigm of religious life that is archaic, static, and removed from the relevance of daily life. No matter how innovative and accommodating a curriculum might be, instructing religious traditions as static objects undermines any subjective inroads that might be made. When religion enters the counselling classroom as an activity, students are better able to integrate religion and spirituality into their professional evolution. This creates a fluid space for the ineffable mysteries of faith to encounter the unique learning styles of counselling students, a space emphasized by Huxley (1945) as a continuum, a spectrum for meaning otherwise not captured by conventional syntax.Instructionally, the clinical ramifications of this shift are instantaneous. When a student is presented with the historical and contemporary facts about a religion, two very important reference points are established that define the curricular experience. The first involves the reciprocal relationship between a student's sense of self and the religious framework provided. Because the nature of religion automatically incorporates the ontology of the learner, a significant and overlooked consequence develops in which a narrow presentation of religious reality equates to an equally myopic sense of self. The second reference point around the objectified vision of religion involves self-awareness of counselling students projecting their own unexamined and hidden agendas onto their religious clients, making the curricular responsibility of emphasizing student self-awareness all the more important. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Counselling and PsychotherapySame topicReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207