MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2527108173 · doi:10.1109/tcc.2015.2469663

Optimize the Server Provisioning and Request Dispatching in Distributed Memory Cache Services

2015· article· en· W2527108173 on OpenAlexafffund
Boyang Yu, Jianping Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundCummings Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheServerCache algorithmsProvisioningComputer networkSmart CacheCache invalidationQueueCPU cacheCloud computingDistributed computingCache coloringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The distributed cache system contains a group of servers caching different contents based on consistent hashing. The dynamic provisioning of servers helps to improve the system efficiency, which leads to a reduction of energy cost. We first measure the cache hit rate, request batching effect and cache warm-up time of the system through experiments, considering that they can affect the system performance and efficiency. Then we formulate a stochastic network optimization problem, which aims at achieving objectives on the queue stability, energy cost and cache hit rate simultaneously, through the dynamic control of server activeness and request dispatching. The problem is transformed into a minimization problem in each time slot, which is further addressed through the proposed efficient online algorithm based on dynamic programming. Moreover, we improve the scheme with several practical considerations in the scheme implementation. Finally, the proposed algorithm and the improvements are evaluated through extensive experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cloud ComputingSame topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207