MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2527157018 · doi:10.3917/gmcc.263.0105

Paribas en Roumanie, influence bancaire et impératifs politiques

2016· article· fr· W2527157018 on OpenAlex
François Pelletier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGuerres mondiales et conflits contemporains · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicState Capitalism and Financial Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au tournant du xx e siècle, une nouvelle forme d’énergie s’impose peu à peu par sa supériorité au charbon. La France prend pourtant un sérieux retard dans le domaine de la recherche et de l’exploitation pétrolière. Les besoins croissants de l’industrie et la mécanisation des forces armées vont remettre en question cette attitude passive. La Première Guerre mondiale catalyse le changement. Le gouvernement français utilise alors tous les moyens à sa disposition pour favoriser la création d’une puissante industrie pétrolière nationale. Parallèlement, les grandes banques françaises se lancent dans le secteur. Cet article retrace le processus qui mène à l’implantation de Paribas dans l’industrie pétrolière roumaine. Cet investissement a une portée politique certaine. La Roumanie occupe une place très importante dans la hiérarchie des pays pétroliers. Les enjeux sont importants. La présence française en Roumanie doit contribuer à l’encerclement politique et économique de l’Allemagne.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it