MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2527477972

서울 오피스 임대시장의 렌트프리 결정요인 분석

2015· article· ko· W2527477972 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
여태종, 류강민, 김형주

Bibliographic record

Venue부동산학연구 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicKorean Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRentingEconomic rentEconomicsOrdered logitQuarter (Canadian coin)Financial crisisEconometricsFinancial economicsMicroeconomicsStatisticsMacroeconomicsMathematicsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There were some changes in the Seoul office rental market after the global financial crisis. The typical changes included introduction of rent-free terms and a rise in the vacancy rate. The purpose of this studywas to identify the characteristics and causes of rent-free that exists after the global financial crisis. Depending on market conditions, rent-free terms deflate the real rental price, not the asking price, and some gaps between the two types of rental prices have been observed. However, most of the literature on the asking rental price for rents attempts to estimate relationships among variables in the rental market. This study assumed that vacancy rates and related variables (building size, rental price, building age) influenced the rent-free period and the effects of its determinants using the ordinal logit model. The results show that the vacancy rate, building size, and rental price are positively correlated with the rent-free period, but that building age is negatively correlated. This study analyzed the rent-free data on office buildings in Seoul containing at least 3,000 square feet of office space in the third quarter of 2013. The influencing factors for the rent-free terms were analyzed with multiple logistic regression models included in the Appendix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.559
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue부동산학연구Same topicKorean Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207