Lignes directrices facultatives en matière de pensions alimentaires pour époux – Pertinence de leur application au Québec?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé L’approche sur laquelle reposent les Lignes directrices facultatives en matière de pensions alimentaires pour époux vise à instaurer plus de certitude et de prévisibilité dans la détermination des pensions alimentaires entre époux et ex-époux, divorcés ou en instance de l’être. Au moyen de formules basées sur les revenus des deux époux, leur âge respectif et la durée de leur cohabitation, ces lignes permettent de situer le montant et la durée de la pension alimentaire payable par le débiteur, à l’intérieur de fourchettes préétablies. L’analyse qui suit montre que les pensions alimentaires octroyées par les tribunaux québécois sont moins généreuses que celles qui résultent de l’application des Lignes directrices facultatives. En conclusion, on s’interroge sur les raisons des différences observées et sur la pertinence des Lignes directrices facultatives au Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".