Production of Hydrogen from Ethanol Using Pt/Hydrotalcite Catalysts Stabilized with Tungsten Oxides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An stabilization effect of WOx over the Pt/hydrotalcite catalysts to produce H2 by ethanol steam reforming at low concentration was studied. The catalysts were characterized by N2 physisorption, X-ray diffraction, Infrared (IR), and UV-vis spectroscopy. The catalytic tests were made in a fixed bed reactor. The catalysts showed porous with the shape of parallel layers with a monomodal mesoporous distribution. By IR spectroscopy it was found superficial chemical such as: -OH, H2O, Al-OH, Mg-OH, and CO32-. The reaction products were; H2, CO2, CH3CHO, CH4 and C2H4. These catalysts did not produce CO and showed low selectivity to C2H4. By XRD we found that catalysts having Pt and the lowest W concentration showed the highest crystallinity and the highest stability during the reaction of ethanol steam reforming. A possible thermal stabilization effect of W in the hydrotalcite crystal structure leading to prevent the Pt sintering is proposed. By IR the hydrotalcite hydroxil groups coordinated with Mg and Al decreased by the presence of WOx. We found that catalysts with low W concentration and Pt having high crystallinity showed the highest stability after ethanol steam reforming. It could be a possible thermal stabilization effect of W in the hydrotalcite crystal structure leading to prevent the Pt sintering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".