MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2527580702 · doi:10.1109/aim.2016.7576934

Real-time needle shape prediction in soft-tissue based on image segmentation and particle filtering

2016· article· en· W2527580702 on OpenAlexaff
Jay Carriere, Carlos Rossa, Nawaid Usmani, Mahdi Tavakoli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Object Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceImage segmentationComputer visionComputer scienceSegmentationScale-space segmentationImage (mathematics)Particle (ecology)Particle filterPattern recognition (psychology)GeologyKalman filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prostate brachytherapy is a current technique used to treat cancerous tissue in the prostate by permanently implanting radioactive seeds through the use of long flexible needles. This paper proposes a real-time method to predict the shape of a flexible needle inserted into soft tissue using axial Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) image segmentation and a non-holonomic bicycle model informed via particle filter. The needle location is tracked in TRUS images to capture the needle shape up to a specified depth. Through the use of a particle filter the noisy tracked needle shape is used to update the parameters of a kinematic bicycle model in a robust manner to predict the shape of the entire needle after it is fully inserted. The method is verified in both ex-vivo beef phantom tissue and in-vivo clinical images, yielding an average tip prediction error of less that 0.5 mm in both the ex-vivo and in-vivo image sets with a peak processing time of less than 9.5 ms per image frame.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Object Detection TechniquesFrench-language works237,207