One What? Why GI Researchers Should Know and Care About the One Health Initiative

The One Health Initiative is an international movement that began in 2006 and is supported by, among others, the American Medical Association and the US Centers for Disease Control.1Available from: http://www.onehealthinitiative.com. Accessed September 14, 2016.Google Scholar Its goal is both laudable and logical: to bring together animal, human, and environmental health practitioners for collaborations that enhance health and well being, broadly and globally. Sadly, although One Health (and the related concept of Zoobiquity2Available from: http://www.zoobiquity.com. Accessed September 14, 2016.Google Scholar) are widely appreciated in the veterinary community, they are generally unknown in the human medical community, especially among subspecialists such as gastroenterologists.3Wolfe L.A. Why the human side lags behind in One Health.Veterinary Practice News. June 10, 2015; Google Scholar I first heard of One Health from a veterinary collaborator a year ago, and an informal survey of colleagues in gastrointestinal (GI) research suggested that most are similarly unaware of One Health. Veterinarians perform endoscopies and liver biopsies; make use of advanced imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography scans) and laboratory tests; use chemotherapy and cutting-edge interventional radiology approaches in pets with luminal, pancreatic, and liver cancers; and manage many diseases such as GI diseases and others on a long-term basis. However, the veterinary and human medical systems largely exist in parallel, with many physicians and nonveterinary school researchers having little appreciation for the breadth of disease in animals or the sophistication involved in modern veterinary care. Gastroenterologists and GI researchers outside of the veterinary community often are unaware of the large number of potentially relevant naturally occurring animal models, many of which are the subject of innovative research into pathophysiology and treatments. Diseases of cats and dogs with direct relevance to human medicine include inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), pancreatitis, and hepatobiliary disease.4Jergens A.E. Simpson K.W. Inflammatory bowel disease in veterinary medicine.Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2012; 4: 1404-1419Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar, 5Watson P. Pancreatitis in dogs and cats: definitions and pathophysiology.J Small Anim Pract. 2015; 56: 3-12Crossref Scopus (45) Google Scholar Both dogs and cats develop a variety of IBD syndromes with similarities to human disease; in particular, cats develop a variant with associated pancreatitis and cholangitis, and some species of dogs (notably German Shepherds) develop a Crohn’s disease–like illness with perianal fistulas.4Jergens A.E. Simpson K.W. Inflammatory bowel disease in veterinary medicine.Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2012; 4: 1404-1419Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar Cats can be affected by both primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis–like diseases, both of which may shed light on the pathogenesis and treatment of the human equivalents.4Jergens A.E. Simpson K.W. Inflammatory bowel disease in veterinary medicine.Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2012; 4: 1404-1419Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar Companion animal models also may help researchers to understand liver diseases including those associated with copper overload, drug-induced injury, and regeneration.6Fieten H. Gill Y. Martin A.J. et al.The Menkes and Wilson disease genes counteract in copper toxicosis in Labrador retrievers: a new canine model for copper-metabolism disorders.Dis Model Mech. 2016; 9: 25-38Crossref Scopus (50) Google Scholar For example, congenital portosystemic shunts with associated liver atrophy are common in dogs, and published and ongoing studies aimed at enhancing regeneration may identify agents that could be useful in human beings.7Kruitwagen H.S. Arends B. Spee B. et al.Recombinant hepatocyte growth factor treatment in a canine model of congenital liver hypoplasia.Liver Int. 2011; 31: 940-949Crossref Scopus (8) Google Scholar, 8Spee B. Penning L.C. van den Ingh T.S. et al.Regenerative and fibrotic pathways in canine hepatic portosystemic shunt and portal vein hypoplasia, new models for clinical hepatocyte growth factor treatment.Comp Hepatol. 2005; 4: 7Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar Many vaccines and other therapies originally developed for animals have crossed over to human medicine. This is particularly true for stem cell therapies (which have been used for, among many diseases, the treatment of canine fistulizing IBD).9Hoffman A.M. Dow S.W. Concise review: stem cell trials using companion animal disease models.Stem Cells. 2016; 34: 1709-1729Crossref Scopus (109) Google Scholar, 10Ferrer L. Kimbrel E.A. Lam A. et al.Treatment of perianal fistulas with human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells: a canine model of human fistulizing Crohn's disease.Regen Med. 2016; 11: 33-43Crossref Scopus (42) Google Scholar, 11Volk S.W. Theoret C. Translating stem cell therapies: the role of companion animals in regenerative medicine.Wound Repair Regen. 2013; 21: 382-394Crossref Scopus (62) Google Scholar Pet owners increasingly demand state-of-the art care for their animals, and thus there are increasing numbers of veterinary clinical trials that ultimately may have human relevance. Cancers in pets are one of the few large groups of diseases that have caught the attention of the human health system (and the National Institutes of Health). Companion animals develop GI cancers—oral cancers are common in cats; both cats and dogs develop hepatocellular, colorectal, and gastric cancers; and insulinomas are common in ferrets.12Bakthavatchalu V. Muthupalani S. Marini R.P. et al.Endocrinopathy and aging in ferrets.Vet Pathol. 2016; 53: 349-365Crossref Scopus (17) Google Scholar, 13Willard M.D. Alimentary neoplasia in geriatric dogs and cats.Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2012; 42 (vi): 693-706Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar, 14van Sprundel R.G. van den Ingh T.S. Guscetti F. et al.Classification of primary hepatic tumours in the cat.Vet J. 2014; 202: 255-266Crossref Scopus (19) Google Scholar, 15van Sprundel R.G. van den Ingh T.S. Guscetti F. et al.Classification of primary hepatic tumours in the dog.Vet J. 2013; 197: 596-606Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar There is increasing use of dogs as part of comparative oncology efforts, particularly the National Cancer Institute Comparative Oncology Program, which is designed to understand tumor biology and test new chemotherapeutic agents and other therapies.16Available from: https://ccrod.cancer.gov/confluence/display/CCRCOPWeb/Home. Accessed September 4, 2016.Google Scholar Animals other than pets are also of significant interest to the GI community. GI clinical practitioners are among those on the front lines dealing with the fallout from farming and livestock husbandry practices that lead to food-borne illnesses. Wildlife and livestock can serve as sentinels, key resources in the armamentarium against zoonotic and other infectious diseases, many of which have GI effects; similarly, animals can serve as important indicators of toxic exposures and other environmental disasters. Although this can have immediate relevance as far as preventing human exposures, it also has research relevance. The hedgehog inhibitor cyclopamine, for example, was isolated from the California corn lily Veratrum californicum and identified in 1966 after extensive investigations into possible genetic and environmental causes of outbreaks of cyclopia in sheep.17Chen J.K. I only have eye for ewe: the discovery of cyclopamine and development of Hedgehog pathway-targeting drugs.Nat Prod Rep. 2016; 33: 595-601Crossref Google Scholar, 18Keeler R.F. Binns W. Teratogenic compounds of Veratrum californicum (Durand). II. Production of ovine fetal cyclopia by fractions and alkaloid preparations.Can J Biochem. 1966; 44: 829-838Crossref Scopus (49) Google Scholar Similarly, my colleagues and I recently isolated a toxin likely responsible for biliary atresia in livestock.19Lorent K. Gong W. Koo K.A. et al.Identification of a plant isoflavonoid that causes biliary atresia.Sci Transl Med. 2015; 7: 286ra67Crossref PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar Perhaps of greatest relevance to the readers of Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology is the concept of One Health in the identification of GI research models. Historically and continuing today, rodents are the primary in vivo animal models used to study GI disease. Although the importance of rodents and particularly genetically altered mice in GI research is dramatic, less well appreciated is the potential utility of large animal models in research. The Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals database has catalogued more than 1500 potential large animal models of human disease, including those with single-gene defects and those with more complex modes of acquired and inherited disease.20Available from: http://omia.angis.org.au. Accessed September 14, 2016.Google Scholar Large animals may prove to be superior to rodents as models to study diseases that result from external and environmental stressors, such as those associated with obesity, diabetes, and cancer. Pigs, for example, are particularly useful in studying liver diseases, especially nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.21Lee L. Alloosh M. Saxena R. et al.Nutritional model of steatohepatitis and metabolic syndrome in the Ossabaw miniature swine.Hepatology. 2009; 50: 56-67Crossref PubMed Scopus (159) Google Scholar Large animals may better mimic human physiology than rodents and this may, for certain experiments, outweigh the increased cost and other problems in using large animals. Other advantages of large animals include longer life spans than rodents, larger sizes that enable more human-like therapies (and more frequent monitoring of certain side effects), and a greater tolerance for imaging and biopsies. This issue of Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology includes 2 contributions that highlight the relevance of One Health concepts in GI research. Ziegler et al22Ziegler A. Gonzalez L. Blikslager A. et al.Large animal models: the key to translational discovery in digestive disease research.Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 2: 716-724Scopus (84) Google Scholar review the use of large animals, particularly pigs, as physiologically relevant models of luminal GI disease, noting that pigs are in many ways superior to rodents as models to study the intestine. Anwer’s23Anwer M.S. GI research in a veterinary school.Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 2: 704-706Scopus (2) Google Scholar Paths and Places column provides practical advice for researchers in veterinary schools and also points out the criticisms veterinary researchers face when trying to obtain funding for projects that link naturally occurring animal models (which often cannot be manipulated genetically) to human diseases. Both articles make clear, as this commentary also has emphasized, that better understanding of the power of animal models and developing and strengthening the links between veterinary and human medicine significantly could benefit human (as well as animal) health. Although One Health envisions broad solutions, often at the policy level, for the treatment and prevention of health problems worldwide, integrated research is an important component and one to which all GI researchers can contribute. Although I take full responsibility for the contents of this commentary, I am very grateful to my veterinary colleagues for their insights and advice on the topic of One Health, particularly Cynthia Leveille-Webster (Tufts/Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine), Susan Volk (University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine), and Peter Windsor (University of Sydney). Illustration by Addy Stupin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.