Construction du personnage et argumentation philosophique (sur un scénario inédit de Jean-Paul Sartre)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Verso 1955 Sartre ha cominciato a scrivere la sceneggiatura di un film dedicato a una figura marginale del periodo del Terrore durante la Rivoluzione francese : Joseph Le Bon. Gli appunti inediti che conosciamo (una sessantina di fogli conservati a Austin e a Ottawa) non permettono affatto di comprendere perché questo progetto è stato abbandonato. Ma confrontando questi appunti ad altri testi contemporanei - qualche passaggio della Critica délia ragione dialettica e un altro insieme di pagine inedite (il progetto "Uguaglianza e libertà") - si può capire come Sartre abbia avuto il sentimento che gli sviluppi richiesta dalla scrittura di una trama psicologica, che avrebbe permesso di dare al film un qualche spessore, non erano compatibili con la teoria antipsicologica della dialettica storica che Sartre stata elaborando in quel momento.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".