MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W252763345

What Is a First-Year Elementary School Teacher to Do? Supplying the Classroom for the Early Elementary Grades

2010· article· en· W252763345 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle A. Jordan, Becky Sinclair, Susan Szabo

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œDelta Kappa Gamma bulletin · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Technology Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCourseworkMathematics educationCurriculumClassroom managementTeaching methodPsychologyPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study was undertaken in response to a novice teacher's realization that most early elementary school teachers (grades K-2) purchase and provide the majority of their classroom supplies, teaching tools, charts, posters, books, crafts, games, manipulatives, and props used to conduct lessons. This study surveyed 27 elementary classroom teachers to learn what kinds of supplies were available to them during their first year of teaching, how they supplied their classroom with materials, and what advice they had for new teachers looking for affordable supplies. Introduction Preservice teachers pursuing an elementary education degree attend many curriculum and instruction courses to learn how to become an effective classroom teacher. Along with content classes such as math, science, and social studies, pre-service teachers take coursework where they learn about effective teaching methods, classroom management techniques, and strategies that promote student learning. In addition, they learn it is important to ...give children opportunities to makes choices about what they're learning and to make their discoveries through trial and error (Denton & Kriete, 2000, p. 13). Once these pre-service teachers reach their final semester, they are anxious to get out of the university classroom and into their own classrooms to work with children and to put their new knowledge to work. However, this is when many new teachers may be confronted with the realization that they are responsible for providing various teaching supplies, instructional materials, manipulatives, props, posters, charts, books, crafts, and games to help make learning more meaningful for their elementary students. For some new teachers, this realization may pose a financial challenge, as these supplies are needed before they have received their first paycheck. This lack of resources may also contribute to a sense of fear and/or panic when new teachers face their first classroom without teaching/learning materials. Purpose of the Study Few question the important role elementary school teachers play in the education of children. Research has shown it is the classroom teacher who has the most impact on student learning (Allington & McGill-Franzen, 2004; DarlingHammond, 1999; Stronge, 2007; Stronge, Tucker, & Hindman, 2004). In addition, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2010-2011) states: Kindergarten and elementary school teachers play a vital role in the development of children. What children learn and experience during their early years can shape their views of themselves and the world and can affect their later success or failure in school, work and their personal lives. Kindergarten and elementary school teachers introduce children to mathematics, language, science, and social studies. They use games, music, artwork, films, books, computers, and other tools to teach the basics. (Nature of the Work section, ¶4) Extensive research assesses the job stress, the classroom performance, and the emotional support needs of new teachers (Charles A. Dana Center, 2001; Herbert & Ramsay, 2004; Ingersoll & Kralik, 2004). However, relatively little research has addressed the resource material needs of first-year teachers. Therefore, this study surveyed current classroom teachers to discover how they had successfully gathered teaching resources and supplies for their classrooms during their first-year of teaching. Literature Review Teacher Spending Teachers are dedicated to the academic success of their students. Thus, they are often willing to sacrifice their personal time and money to provide the materials they believe are needed to help their students learn academic content. The National School Supply and Equipment Association Report (NSSEA, 2008, Highlights section, ¶5) estimates first-year teachers spend an average of $770 of their money on classroom materials. In addition, teachers continue to spend yearly approximately $400 of their money (NSSEA, 2008). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œDelta Kappa Gamma bulletinSame topicEducation and Technology IntegrationFrench-language works237,207