MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2527702374 · doi:10.1115/detc2001/vib-21543

Scattering and Transmission of Mixed-Mode Waves in Delaminated Thick Composite Beams

2001· article· en· W2527702374 on OpenAlexaff
D. Roy Mahapatra, S. Gopalakrishnan, T. S. Sankar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodDelamination (geology)Beam (structure)Materials scienceDiscretizationScatteringFrequency domainFourier transformAcousticsStructural engineeringOpticsPhysicsEngineeringMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A spectral finite element model is developed to study scattering and transmission of axial-flexural-torsional coupled waves in multi-sitedelaminated thick composite beams. The analysis may find its suitability and superiority to capture the high frequency dynamics of laminated composite structure in vibrating environment and for health monitoring in combination with non-destructive test data. Spectral finite element considering first order shear deformation is used to model the delaminated segments along the span of the beam, as well as the delaminated ply-groups in thickness direction. This spectral element is derived from exact solution to the 3D governing wave equations in Fourier domain. As aresult, the thin sublaminates and beam segments do not lock. Spatial discretization is carried out in a similar way as in conventional finite element method. The major differences from conventional finite element method are (1) the transformation of all the fields from temporal to frequency domain is carried out using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) algorithm, (2) the global system is solved at each frequency step (3) fine meshing at the delamination tip to capture the crack-tip singularity (as in conventional finite element discretization) is not required (4) the overall system size becomes many order smaller than that in conventional finite element methods. The study essentially includes unsymmetry induced due to ply orientations and due to multiple delamination across beam thickness. A case study is presented to show the effect of wave transmission and scattering by a single through delamination in unidirectional composite beam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Health Monitoring TechniquesFrench-language works237,207