MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W25277548 · doi:10.7202/1033105ar

Le droit d’auteur : de l’imprimerie à l’autoroute de l’information

2015· article· fr· W25277548 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Adrien Giguère

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentation et bibliothèques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCopyright and Intellectual Property
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesAuteur theoryPolitical sciencePhilosophyArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La notion de droit d’auteur telle que nous la connaissons aujourd’hui s’est modifiée depuis 400 ans au gré des changements sociaux et technologiques et elle se transformera encore avec la venue des environnements électroniques. Dans cette optique, il est intéressant de retracer les grandes lignes de l’origine et de l’évolution du droit d’auteur et de s’interroger sur l’avenir que lui réserve l’arrivée de l’autoroute de l’information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0170.014
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumentation et bibliothèquesSame topicCopyright and Intellectual PropertyFrench-language works237,207