MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2527790484 · doi:10.1007/978-3-476-03793-0_1

Die Ursachen des Krieges und die Möglichkeit des Friedens heute

2000· book-chapter· de· W2527790484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJ.B. Metzler eBooks · 2000
Typebook-chapter
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Relations and Foreign Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Den Anlaß des Gedenkens bildet nicht nur die Erinnerung an den Westfälischen Frieden, der vor 350 Jahren geschlossen worden ist. Den Anlaß bildet vielmehr auch die aktuelle Einsicht, daß das von diesem Frieden begründete und nach ihm benannte »westfälische« Staatensystem 1990 zu Ende gegangen ist. Wir feiern also nicht nur den Anfang, wir konstatieren auch das Ende. In der friedlichen Auflösung des Ost-West-Konflikts zeigte sich der Verfall des im Westfälischen Frieden gestifteten Systems und seiner Verhaltensregulative. Dieser Befund gilt nur für den Bereich Euro-Atlantik, also den Einzugsbereich des Ost-West-Konflikts von Vancouver bis Wladiwostok. Von ihm wird hier die Rede sein; in seinem Zentrum steht Europa, das 1648 neu geordnet worden ist. Der Westfälische Friede bezeichnet damit eine historische Periode, die als abgeschlossen gelten kann.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it