MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2527925720 · doi:10.21831/medikora.v15i2.23144

PENGEMBANGAN MODEL BODY WEIGHT TRAINING UNTUK LATIHAN OTOT PERUT

2019· article· id· W2527925720 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMEDIKORA · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsMedicineBody weightGynecologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kurangnya pengetahuan tentang model/variasi latihan body weight menyebabkan members fitness/pelaku olahraga pada saat melakukan latihan beban terkesan monoton, kurang bervariasi dan membosankan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan model body weight training untuk latihan otot perut, yang nantinya dapat menjadi panduan untuk latihan otot perut dan diharapkan dapat mempercepat pembentukan otot perut menjadi sixspack. Model-model body weight training lebih menekankan pada spesifikasi bagian otot perut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan model dengan langkah-langkah penelitiannya sebagai berikut: (1) mengenali potensi dan masalah, (2) pengumpulan data, (3) desain produk, (4) validasi desain, (5) revisi desain, (6) uji coba produk, (7) revisi produk, (8) uji coba pemakaian, (9) revisi produk, dan (10) produk masal. Validasi draf model latihan dilakukan oleh tiga ahli/pakar materi tentang kebugaran fisik. Sampel penelitian dalam uji coba skala kecil berjumlah 5 responden dan uji coba skala besar berjumlah 20 responden. Penelitian dilakukan di Club Arena International Hotel Pandanaran, Hotel Jambuluwuk, dan Hotel Ros In. Teknik analisis data menggunakan data kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Data kualitatif diperoleh dari: (1) hasil wawancara dengan members fitness center, (2) catatan lapangan, dan (3) data saran perbaikan draf model awal dan hasil observasi pada pelaksanaan uji coba dengan skala kecil dan besar. Data kuantitatif diperoleh dari: (1) penilaian skala nilai validasi draf model, (2) penilaian skala nilai observasi pelaksanaan model, dan (3) hasil penilaian kuesioner uji coba skala kecil dan besar dari responden. Hasil yang diperoleh dari data validasi draf model dan observasi pelaksanaan model latihan oleh ahli/pakar 100 % baik sekali. Hasil penilaian kuesioner uji coba skala kecil 80 % baik sekali dan 20 % baik, sedangkan untuk hasil kuesioner uji coba skala besar 60 % baik sekali dan 40 % baik. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut dapat diartikan bahwa model body weight training untuk latihan otot perut layak untuk digunakan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0340.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it