MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2527952592 · doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.47.2581

Holography, Hydrodynamization and Heavy-ion Collisions

2016· article· en· W2527952592 on OpenAlex
Michał P. Heller

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Physica Polonica B · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegrable systemUnitarityQuantization (signal processing)PhysicsHomogeneous spaceScatteringS-matrixMatrix (chemical analysis)Mathematical physicsTheoretical physicsSineCharge (physics)Classical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we give a pedagogical introduction into integrable models. First, we review how classical integrable models can be constructed by demanding the existence of a higher spin conserved charge. The primary examples are the sinh-Gordon and sine-Gordon theories whose classical integrability is exactly shown by exploiting the Bcklund transformation. Lagrangian quantization together with the LSZ reduction formula provide insight into the functional properties and analytical structure of the scattering matrices. These are the inputs in the S-matrix bootstrap program, which determine the scattering matrices from global symmetries, crossing and unitarity properties. Then it is shown how the scattering matrices can be used to calculate the large volume spectrum of the theory. We end the paper by overviewing the literature where the various steps of the analogue integrable developments in the AdS/CFT correspondence were developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it