“Staying Out” Rather than “Cracking In”: Asymmetric Membrane Insertion of 12:0 Lysophosphocholine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interactions between detergents and model membranes are well described by the three-stage model: saturation and solubilization boundaries divide bilayer-only, bilayer–micelle coexistence, and micelle-only ranges. An underlying assumption of the model is the equilibration of detergent between the two membrane leaflets. However, many detergents partition asymmetrically at room temperature due to slow flip-flop, such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and lysolipids. In this work, we use isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) to investigate the solubilization of unilamellar POPC vesicles by 12:0 lysophosphocholine (12:0 LPC). Flip-flop of 12:0 LPC occurs beyond the time scale of our experiments, which establish a characteristic nonequilibrated state with asymmetric distribution: 12:0 LPC partitions primarily into the outer leaflet. Increasing asymmetry stress in the membrane does not lead to membrane failure, i.e., “cracking in” as seen for alkyl maltosides and other surfactants; instead, it reduces further membrane insertion which leads to the “staying out” of 12:0 LPC in solution. At above the critical micellar concentration of 12:0 LPC in the presence of the membrane, micelles persist and accommodate further LPC but take up lipid from vesicles only very slowly. Ultimately, solubilization proceeds via the micellar mechanism (Kragh-Hansen et al., 1995). With a combination of demicellization and solubilization experiments, we quantify the molar ratio partition coefficient (0.6 ± 0.1 mM –1 ) and enthalpy of partitioning (6.1 ± 0.3 kJ·mol –1 ) and estimate the maximum detergent/lipid ratio reached in the outer leaflet (<0.13). Despite the inapplicability of the three-stage model to 12:0 LPC at room temperature, we are able to extract quantitative information from ITC solubilization experiments and DLS that are important for the understanding of asymmetry-dependent processes such as endocytosis and the gating of mechanosensitive channels in vitro .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".