La imperfección de la poesía: una interpretación del poema El golem de Jorge Luis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El narrador y el ensayista argentino Jorge Luis Borges (1899-1986) es uno de los autores fundamentales de la literatura del siglo XX (Myers, 2014) y es conocido por la literatura filosofica y el genero fantastico. En su poema El golem, Borges enfatiza la religion y la filosofia, principalmente aspectos del platonismo, cristianismo y judaismo. A lo largo del poema, Borges se refiere a sus principios fundamentales y amalgama aspectos de las tres filosofias para sacar a la luz la imperfeccion de la creacion. Mas a fondo, con el principio fundamental del platonismo y el argumento de que existen imperfecciones en cada filosofia de la creacion, Borges muestra la imperfeccion de los nombres y por lo tanto, la imperfeccion universal del lenguaje. Por consiguiente, la tecnica de lenguaje que Borges usa para expresar la imperfeccion de la creacion, la poesia, es ironicamente imperfecta en si misma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".