La narconovela mexicana, desarrollo, posicionamiento y consolidación en el campo literario nacional
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen En el presente escrito se realiza una revisión extratextual de la denominada narconovela mexicana (1990 a 2014), en particular se analiza la génesis y evolución del género, a partir de los conceptos propuestos por el sociólogo Pierre Bourdieu. Asimismo, se sustenta como planteamiento central que esta vertiente literaria tiene su origen y consolidación, dentro del campo literario mexicano, principalmente, a la propuesta literaria de los escritores del norte de México, entre quienes destacan Élmer Mendoza, Eduardo Antonio Parra, Víctor Hugo Rascón Banda, entre otros. Abstract In this brief is an extra-textual review of the "so-called" Mexican narconovela (1990-2014). In particular, it discusses the genesis and evolution of the genre from the concepts proposed by the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. It also supports as its central approach that this literary aspect has its origin and consolidation within Mexican literature, mainly the literary proposals of Northern Mexican writers, highlighted by individuals like Élmer Mendoza, Eduardo Antonio Parra, Víctor Hugo Rascón Banda; among others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it