La narconovela mexicana, desarrollo, posicionamiento y consolidación en el campo literario nacional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen En el presente escrito se realiza una revisión extratextual de la denominada narconovela mexicana (1990 a 2014), en particular se analiza la génesis y evolución del género, a partir de los conceptos propuestos por el sociólogo Pierre Bourdieu. Asimismo, se sustenta como planteamiento central que esta vertiente literaria tiene su origen y consolidación, dentro del campo literario mexicano, principalmente, a la propuesta literaria de los escritores del norte de México, entre quienes destacan Élmer Mendoza, Eduardo Antonio Parra, Víctor Hugo Rascón Banda, entre otros. Abstract In this brief is an extra-textual review of the "so-called" Mexican narconovela (1990-2014). In particular, it discusses the genesis and evolution of the genre from the concepts proposed by the sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. It also supports as its central approach that this literary aspect has its origin and consolidation within Mexican literature, mainly the literary proposals of Northern Mexican writers, highlighted by individuals like Élmer Mendoza, Eduardo Antonio Parra, Víctor Hugo Rascón Banda; among others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".