MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2528335268 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt16.169

Effect of Downstream Flapping Plate on the Flow Field Characteristics behind a Circular Cylinder

2016· article· en· W2528335268 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Roam Simenthy, Vasudevan Raghavan, Shaligram Tiwari

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlappingCylinderMechanicsDownstream (manufacturing)Flow (mathematics)Field (mathematics)PhysicsAerospace engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two-dimensional numerical investigations of flow characteristics behind a circular cylinder in the presence of a flapping plate mounted in the wake have been carried out in the present study. The flapping frequency of the plate has been varied in the range from 0.6 to 1.4 times the vortex shedding frequency behind single stationary circular cylinder in the presence of a stationary plate. The gap between the cylinder and the plate is considered to be 1D, 2D and 3D. The maximum amplitude of the tip of the plate has been fixed to be 0.3D (D being the diameter of the cylinder) for each of the frequency ratio for fixed value of Reynolds number (Re) equal to 100. The length of the plate has been chosen equal to cylinder diameter. The dynamic effects and the behaviour of vortex shedding behind the cylinders have been studied elaborately. Effect of fixed amplitude and varying frequency ratio of the cylinder on wake flow behaviour has been presented in the form of vorticity contours, lift, drag and Strouhal number (St) plots. The dynamic forces as well as the flow structure behind the plate are found to be modified in the presence of the flapping plate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass TransferSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207