MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2528400575 · doi:10.4000/ifha.515

FRYDE, Natalie, MONNET, Pierre, OEXLE, Otto Gerhard, ZYGNER, Leszek, Die Deutung der mittelalterlichen Gesellschaft in der Moderne. L'imaginaire et les conceptions modernes de la société médiévale

2013· article· fr· W2528400575 on OpenAlexaff
Damien Kempf

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en Allemagne · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Legal Studies and Society
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArt historyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’histoire, comme chacun le sait, s’écrit au présent. La façon d’interpréter une période, la sélection des thèmes de recherche évoluent et sont largement dépendants d’un lieu et d’une époque donnés. S’interroger sur l’imaginaire moderne de la société médiévale, c’est s’interroger à la fois sur les traits fondamentaux de la société médiévale et sur le regard moderne constitutif de ces mêmes traits. Ce regard rétrospectif sur l’histoire médiévale s’apparente souvent à un regard introspectif. L...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Institut français d’histoire en AllemagneSame topicHistorical Legal Studies and SocietyFrench-language works237,207