MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2528426493

Learning a multi-criteria classification method using machine learning & metaheuristics techniques

2010· article· en· W2528426493 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMachine learningMetaheuristicArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMultiple-criteria decision analysisContext (archaeology)Data miningMathematicsMathematical optimization
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data classification is a widely used approach in the area of data mining. Methodologies for addressing data classification have been developed in a variety of research disciplines, including artificial intelligence (AI) and Multi-Criteria Decision Aid (MCDA). The objective of this thesis is to develop a new framework for learning the MCDA method PROAFTN. The limitations of PROAFTN are largely due to the set of parameters required to be obtained to perform the classification procedure. That is, to apply PROAFTN, the values of several parameters need to be determined prior to classification, such as boundaries of intervals and weights. In an MCDA context, these parameters are usually dependent on the judgment of the decision maker (DM). This approach has shortcomings, such as being time consuming and dependent on the availability of a qualified DM. To overcome these limitations and to obtain the best parameters from data, an automatic approach is proposed in this work . This thesis introduces new methodologies based on using machine learning and metaheuristic techniques for establishing PROAFTN parameters from data during the training process. The goal is to obtain from training data the best PROAFTN parameters that achieve the highest classification accuracy. To achieve this, different learning methodologies are proposed in this thesis. Firstly, discretization techniques and an inductive approach are introduced to obtain the required parameters for PROAFTN. Secondly, a different approach based on metaheuristic/hybrid-metaheuristic algorithms is used to develop PROAFTN parameters. The use of metaheuristics to learn PROAFTN begins with the formulation of the optimization problem. Then, population-based methods, namely Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Differential Evolution (DE), and the single-point search method Reduced Variable Neighborhood Search (RUNS) are utilized to obtain the best PROAFTN parameters that can be applied on unseen datasets. To test the performance of the proposed learning approaches, their effectiveness in classification is evaluated on several public-domain datasets and compared to a number of well-known machine learning classifiers. Advanced statistical tests such as the Friedman and Nemenyi tests are used for more meaningful comparisons. The general comparative study, including computational results, demonstrates that the proposed approaches are very competitive with and outrank widely used classification algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it