Impianto del dispositivo Reducer in seno coronarico: un nuovo trattamento per l’angina refrattaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Refractory angina is a chronic condition characterized by the presence of disabling symptoms due to severe obstructive coronary artery disease not improved by either optimal medical therapy and/or percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Mortality rates associated with this condition are quite low in clinically stable patients on optimal medical therapy. However, rehospitalization rates are high. In this subgroup of patients there is thus a clinical need for new therapies targeting an improvement of symptoms but taking into account the potential impact in terms of healthcare and costs. A considerable number of innovative therapeutic modalities for the treatment of refractory angina have been investigated over the years. However, none of them has become a standard of care. Devices implanted in coronary sinus are a possible therapeutic option in these patients that may alleviate myocardial ischemia by forcing redistribution of coronary blood flow from less ischemic subepicardium to the more ischemic subendocardium, potentially relieving symptoms of ischemia. The coronary sinus Reducer (Neovasc Inc., Richmond B.C., Canada) is a percutaneous implantable device designed to achieve controlled narrowing of the coronary sinus and to increase its upstream pressure. Coronary sinus Reducer implantation was associated with improvement in symptoms and reduction of myocardial ischemia in pre-clinical and clinical studies. Recently, a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial demonstrated, in 104 patients with refractory angina, its benefit in improving symptoms, when compared to placebo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".