Women, social connections of sex and citizenship Mulheres, relações sociais de sexo e cidadania
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article calls into question the reason why the democratic modernism didn’t include, immediately, women inside its base origin: all men are born free and equal before law. The text supports that the legal recognition of women’s rights to control their own fecundity, throughout the 1980’s, was the fact that made possible for women to be included inside the democratic societies. By the moment when law recognized this right, all formal inequality among men and women were suppressed. This recognition made possible the formation of a demand for parity without suppressing the universalism principle. With the demand for homoparentage, this universalism might be discussed all over again, as in Quebec. The article debates epistemological elements susceptible of breaking the magic circle around de universal tautological defi nition and supports that the presence of sex is neither specifi c nor particular when it comes to women, or when it comes to men. Keywords: Citizenship. Sex social connections. Maternity. Homosexuality. Homoparentage. Procreation. O artigo questiona a razão pela qual a modernidade democrática não incluiu imediatamente as mulheres no princípio que a fundamenta: todos os homens nascem livres e iguais perante a lei. Sustenta que o reconhecimento legal do direito das mulheres de controlar sua própria fecundidade, em torno dos anos 1980, foi o fato que possibilitou a inclusão das mulheres nas sociedades democráticas. A partir do momento em que a lei reconheceu esse direito, toda desigualdade formal entre homens e mulheres acabou sendo suprimida. Esse reconhecimento permitiu formular a reivindicação da paridade sem abolir o princípio do universalismo. Com a reivindicação da homoparentalidade, esse universalismo é susceptível de ser rediscutido, como ocorre no Quebec. Traz para o debate elementos epistemológicos suscetíveis de romper com o círculo mágico que está em volta da definição tautológica do universal e sustenta que a pertença de sexo não é nem particular ou específica quando se trata de mulheres, ou quando se trata de homens. Palavras-chave: Cidadania. Relações Sociais de Sexo. Maternidade. Homossexualidade. Homoparentalidade. Procriação.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".