Investigating Vincenti Engineering Principles in Support to the Auditing of Measurement Processes in Agile Organizations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ISO 9001 impacts the entire range of software life cycle activities, including software planning, software requirements gathering and analysis, software construction, the software life cycle traceability process, and the measurement process To address all these activities, software organizations that need to become ISO 9001 certified find themselves in a position where they need to develop a myriad of tools and techniques to demonstrate that their software processes are in conformity with this ISO quality standard. A common methodology is to have in place a certification team (i.e. software analysts) responsible for understanding which ISO 9001 clauses impact the organization's business processes, including software process activities. This team must also assess the development team process to demonstrate that the software products are being developed according to ISO 9001 requirements: in essence, this means providing documented evidence that clarifies how and when a particular design decision has been implemented. The collection of evidences constitutes a very important foundation on which the auditors base their audit results and conclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it