MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2528829470

Development and preliminary testing of sustainable development indicators for biosolids management at regional/local level in Ireland

2007· dissertation· en· W2528829470 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Magnus Amajirionwu

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch@THEA · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute for Occupational Safety and HealthDepartment for International DevelopmentVirginia Department of HealthU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyTeagascInternational Labour OrganizationEuropean Environment AgencyEconomic and Social Research CouncilEuropean CommissionInternational Development Research CentreUnited Nations Development ProgrammeMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsBiosolidsSustainable developmentEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementBusinessEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Management of biosolids (treated sewage sludge) is becoming a significant issue for Local Authorities throughout Ireland, especially with the progressive implementation of the EU Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC of 1991. The future of biosolids management will depend on what direction Local Authorities take in the immediate future. This direction will be determined by quantity and quality of treated sewage sludge, types of sludge treatment available/selected and recycling/disposal outlets that will be acceptable to most stakeholders and most importantly, pose no danger to human health. The aim of this thesis is to develop and conduct a preliminary test of sustainable development indicators (SDIs) for managing biosolids at the regional/local level. Accordingly, a set of 22 SDIs (comprising five headline, seven core and ten complementary indicators) has been developed using a stakeholder-based approach. These indicators are arranged according to the Driving force-Pressure-State-lmpact-Response framework and address all domains of biosolids management namely, production, quality, cost, legislation/regulation, training/research and recycling/disposal. A preliminary test of the indicators was carried out in County Sligo to verify their suitability and usefulness. A key finding of the study is that the SDIs are relatively effective and can make significant contributions to the sustainable management of biosolids. The stakeholder participatory approach adopted in the study meant that the indicator development process involved participants from varied background, knowledge, experience and perspective. Such a ‘mix’ is necessary in order to capture the multi-faceted criteria of sustainable biosolids management. The methodology and analysis of the survey results were designed to ensure an unbiased, critical, and fair input by the participating stakeholders. The thesis concludes by synthesising the findings and making a number of recommendations and suggestions for further research. These propositions, if implemented, could lead to the refinement of the SDIs and generation of new ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch@THEASame topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207