The rhetoric of double allegiance : Imagined communities in North American diasporic Chinese literatures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les travaux les plus populaires de la littérature nord-américaine chinoise peuvent être lus comme structurellement centrés sur une logique du «ni /ni» : il s’agit de textes comme on peut en trouver dans l’oeuvre d’Amy Tan qui n’affichent de fidélité particulière ni à l’Amérique («le pays d’accueil»), ni à la Chine («la patrie»). Plutôt qu’un témoignage de fidélité double, reposant sur une rhétorique positive d’appartenance nationale du type «à la fois/et», les textes figurant dans ce canon affichent une réponse doublement négative, décrite par Sheng-Mei Ma comme «le baiser de la mort» de l’orientalisme. Cette logique trahit la force résiduelle d’un certain nationalisme racialisé, dans les contextes d’identités hybrides et de formation de communautés en diaspora. Au Canada, le roman de Wayson Choy The Jade Peony et son mémoire Paper Shadows, Disappearing Moon Café de SKY Lee et l’histoire de famille de Denise Chong The Concubine’s Children, par exemple, soulignent l’aptitude des formes littéraires canoniques à cristalliser certaines images de «communautés chinoises de l’étranger», leurs relations avec la «mère-patrie » et la fidélité au «pays d’accueil» ou au «pays de résidence».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.028 | 0.047 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".