MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2528966850

The Role of Environmental Stewardship Groups in the Grand River Watershed, Ontario

2014· dissertation· en· W2528966850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janette Kingsbury

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Conservation and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStewardship (theology)WatershedEnvironmental stewardshipEnvironmental planningGeographyEnvironmental resource managementWater resource managementEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental ethicsPolitical scienceComputer sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

Abstract
\nIn this thesis I analyze the role of stewardship groups in the Grand River watershed. The perceptions of stewardship volunteers and key agency informants are examined to determine the biophysical, educational and social implications of stewardship initiatives in the Grand River basin. The first objective is to examine the role of environmental stewardship group participants, understanding their contributions to biophysical or social changes in the Grand River basin. The intent is to determine if biophysical and social changes promoted by stewardship groups are influencing the watershed at a localized community level, whether broader, more cumulative effects are being demonstrated within the river basin, or if both effects are evident. 
\nThe second objective considers the motivations of stewardship volunteers, perspectives regarding involvement with environmental stewardship groups, and contributions to change within the community. Consideration is given to the importance of tangible results for many volunteers, as well as the acknowledgement of the risk for burnout for volunteers involved with environmental groups. The third and final objective considers if the initiatives or changes implemented by stewardship groups are influential in guiding river basin management through policy and decision making. Impact and influence of stewardship groups on decision making are assessed, based on the responses and reports of agency and organizational members, in addition to representatives from municipal and township government offices. 
\nA case study approach is used to investigate the rare Charitable Research Reserve, Woolwich Healthy Communities, and Kitchener’s Natural Areas Program in the Grand River basin. Relevant information pertaining to other stewardship group activity is included where appropriate. Data collection methods included surveys distributed to a combined group of 52 stewardship group volunteers and event participants, 14 personal interviews with key informants, and participant observation from June to October 2013. 
\nThe results indicate that environmental stewardship groups in the Grand River watershed are playing a role in creating biophysical change through the work of on-ground projects such as stream bank restoration initiatives and tree planting projects. Contributions to social change are evident through groups that are committed to community outreach and educational programs, particularly those targeted towards youth and school children. An examination of the motivations for stewardship participation revealed a consistent pattern of three primary reasons. First, there was a desire to contribute to the community or make some environmental enhancement or change. Second, participants expressed a wish to improve ecological or environmental knowledge and awareness. Third, respondents noted a strong sense of volunteering or participating in stewardship as a means to make social connections or meet people with similar interests. The achievement of tangible results for on-ground efforts was observed by both stewardship group participants and organizational members to be important in the avoidance and alleviation of potential volunteer burnout. 
\nConcerns from agency and municipal representatives suggest that stewardship groups tend to have a local, community focus with less concern for the ‘big picture’, or the potential for wider-reaching or cumulative effects of various projects. Yet, examples from the case study groups and other groups in the watershed indicate that there is an influence on the biophysical environment and at a social level beyond the immediate local initiative. Partnerships between stewardship groups and other agencies and organizations are highlighted as a strength with regard to the potential for greater impact at a broader scale in the river basin, as well as an opportunity for future growth and development in collaborative environmental and water management strategies. Corporate partnerships and employee volunteer programs are identified by several of the groups and organizations as valuable and promising approaches to collaborate on environmental stewardship initiatives. 
\nSeveral aspects of this research suggest an opportunity for further study, particularly with regard to how evolving partnerships may contribute to the joint success of stewardship groups and governing or management agencies within the Grand River watershed. It would be interesting to determine if the development of stronger partnerships through collaboration between local stewardship groups and governing agencies such as the Grand River Conservation Authority might lead to larger stewardship initiatives and improved outcomes for targeted areas of need in the river basin.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

How this classification was reachedexpand

The three-model screen

all 5,600 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: about_only · design weight: 3321.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Thesis on environmental stewardship volunteer groups in a watershed.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

This studies environmental stewardship groups and watershed effects, not research itself.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Thesis on environmental stewardship groups in a watershed; environmental management domain.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicEnvironmental Conservation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207