MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2528984602 · doi:10.33137/rr.v26i1.11750

Shakespeare's Last Humanist

2009· article· en· W2528984602 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alan Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanismArtPhilosophyArt historyLiteratureAestheticsTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Give every man thy ear, but few thy voice.Take each man's censure, but reserve thy judgment Costly thy habit as thy purse can buy.But not express'd in fancy, rich not gaudy.For the apparel oft proclaims the man.And they in France of the best rank and station Are of a most select and generous chief in that.Neither a borrower nor a lender be.For loan oft loses both itself and friend.And borrowing dulleth th' edge of husbandry.This above all: to thine own self be true.And it must follow, as the night the day.Thou canst not then be false to any man. (1.3.59-80)T he modem tendency is to find these precepts unimpressive.Harry Levin laughs at them as "etiquette rather than ethics" -and productions of the play will often help us laugh by making Laertes fidget while his father recites them.One production, earlier this century, had Polonius pull a little book out of his pocket and read the precepts from it, demonstrating by stage business that they are not to be "charactered" in memory, since even the man who preaches them does not have them charactered in his.But this matter of "charactering" in the memory is a good bit more serious than

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207