MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2529020454 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527422

MiNDSTEp differential photometry of the gravitationally lensed quasars WFI 2033-4723 and HE 0047-1756: microlensing and a new time delay

2016· article· en· W2529020454 on OpenAlexaff
T. Giannini, R. W. Schmidt, J. Wambsganß, K. A. Alsubai, J. M. Andersen, T. Anguita, V. Bozza, D. M. Bramich, P. Browne, S. Calchi Novati, Y. Damerdji, C. Diehl, P. Dodds, M. Dominik, A. Elyiv, Xiao Fang, R. Figuera Jaimes, F. Finet, T. Gerner, S.-H. Gu, S. Hardis, K. Harpsøe, T. C. Hinse, A. Hornstrup, M. Hundertmark, J. Jessen‐Hansen, U. G. Jørgensen, D. Juncher, N. Kains, E. Kerins, H. Korhonen, C. Liebig, Mikkel N. Lund, M. Lundkvist, G. Maier, L. Mancini, G. Masi, M. Mathiasen, Matthew T. Penny, S. Proft, M. Rabus, S. Rahvar, D. Ricci, G. Scarpetta, K. C. Sahu, Sebastian Schäfer, F. Schönebeck, J. Skottfelt, C. Snodgrass, J. Southworth, J. Surdej, J. Tregloan-Reed, C. Vilela, O. Wertz, F. Zimmer

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersInternational Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems EngineeringKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgStellar Astrophysics CentreHeidelberg Graduate School of Fundamental PhysicsEuropean CommissionQatar National Research FundQatar FoundationKorea Research Council of Fundamental Science and TechnologyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationInternational Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular MicrobiologyVillum FondenFédération Wallonie-BruxellesDanmarks Grundforskningsfond
KeywordsPhysicsQuasarGravitational microlensingAstrophysicsPhotometry (optics)ObservatoryAstronomyBrightnessGalaxyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims. We present V and R photometry of the gravitationally lensed quasars WFI 2033-4723 and HE 0047-1756. The data were taken by the MiNDSTEp collaboration with the 1.54 m Danish telescope at the ESO La Silla observatory from 2008 to 2012.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→