MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2529131184 · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03655

Ambient-Air Stable Lithiated Anode for Rechargeable Li-Ion Batteries with High Energy Density

2016· article· en· W2529131184 on OpenAlexaff
Zeyuan Cao, Pengyu Xu, Haowei Zhai, Sicen Du, Jyotirmoy Mandal, Martin Dontigny, Karim Zaghib, Yuan Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueNano Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
FundersFu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science
KeywordsAnodeMaterials scienceFaraday efficiencyElectrolyteLithium (medication)Chemical engineeringBattery (electricity)CoatingGraphiteElectrodeComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An important requirement of battery anodes is the processing step involving the formation of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) in the initial cycle, which consumes a significant portion of active lithium ions. This step is more critical in nanostructured anodes with high specific capacity, such as Si and Sn, due to their high surface area and large volume change. Prelithiation presents a viable approach to address such loss. However, the stability of prelithiation reagents is a big issue due to their low potential and high chemical reactivity toward O 2 and moisture. Very limited amount of prelithiation agents survive in ambient air. In this research, we describe the development of a trilayer structure of active material/polymer/lithium anode, which is stable in ambient air (10–30% relative humidity) for a period that is sufficient to manufacture anode materials. The polymer layer protects lithium against O 2 and moisture, and it is stable in coating active materials. The polymer layer is gradually dissolved in the battery electrolyte, and active materials contact with lithium to form lithiated anode. This trilayer-structure not only renders electrodes stable in ambient air but also leads to uniform lithiation. Moreover, the degree of prelithiation could vary from compensating SEI to fully lithiated anode. With this strategy, we have achieved high initial Coulombic efficiency of 99.7% in graphite anodes, and over 100% in silicon nanoparticles anodes. The cycling performance of lithiated anodes is comparable or better than those not lithiated. We also demonstrate a Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 /lithiated graphite cell with stable cycling performance. The trilayer structure represents a new prelithiation method to enhance performance of Li-ion batteries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations111
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNano LettersSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207