Influência dos determinantes ambientais no desenvolvimento motor de crianças das creches públicas de Aracaju-SE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The infant motor development is the individual s ability to perform increasingly complex functions and is associated with age. The development is due to the requirement of the task, the biology of the individual and the interaction with the environment in which it entered, and this interaction acts decisively and may aggravate or mitigate the impact of development on biological risk. Motor delays at this stage of development cause damage that may extend into adulthood. The present study aims at analyzing the influence of environmental determinants on motor development of children from public daycare centers in Aracaju / SE, whose instrument of data collection was the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). It was observed that 58.82% of children had a normal motor development, 29.42% suspect motor development and 11.76% remaining have delayed motor development. The results indicate that the length of stay of children in day care centers are not leveraging the appropriate motor development of children, as it is not perceived improvement in motor behavior of children aged 12-18 months, when compared to children attending the nurseries for a shorter time (06-12 months old). In general it can be concluded that the process of motor development is influenced by environmental factors such as lack of good opportunities stimulus via appropriate toys, wider spaces to play and explore the environment among others, limiting motor performance of children in day care centers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".